Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1999No. COA98-873PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

First we consider whether the trial court erred by denying defendant’s motion to suppress his statement to Detective Jones of the Greensboro Police Department. Defendant argues that he requested counsel and that Detective Jones re-initiated contact with him in violation of his fifth amendment right to counsel by entering the interview room and reading him his rights. After careful review, we disagree.

The fifth amendment, applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment, Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, 12 L.Ed. 2d 653 (1964), is a protection against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FeathersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API