Legal Opinion

David Neal and Cathy Chan v. Propymax LLC

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 2, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00776Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DAVID NEAL and CATHY CHAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 25-776-JLH-EGT ) PROPYMAX LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Presently before the Court is the motion for default judgment by pro se Plaintiffs David Neal and Cathy Chan (together, “Plaintiffs”). (D.I. 13). For the reasons stated below, the Court recommends that Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND According to the Complaint, Plaintiffs’ cell phone numbers are primarily used for “residential household purposes” and have been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of Long BranchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Bailey v. Domino's Pizza, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API