Legal Opinion
Knowles Loom Works v. Ryle
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 6, 1899No. 11PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
When this case was here upon a former writ of error this court said:
“Regarding the two instruments of March 16,1895, and July 12, 1895, as parts of one and the same transaction. — which is the most favorable view that can be taken for the Knowles Loom Works, — the conclusion is irresistible that the transaction was not a bailment, but a sale of tbe machinery, with a lease se*731clarity for the price.” Ryle v. Loom Works, 59 U. S. App. 653, 669, 31 C. C. A. 340, 343, 87 Fed. 976, 980.
At the first trial of the case the plaintiff (the Knowles Loom Works) put in evidence the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ryle v. Knowles Loom WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Receivership of Frederica Water, Light & Power Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1915
- Tilford v. Atlantic Match Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905