Legal Opinion

Anaya v. Anaya

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 7, 1992No. 91-1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Rafael Anaya (husband), appeals from a final judgment awarding child support. We affirm.

Husband contends that the trial court erred because it did not strictly apply the statutory guideline method of determining child support. In Todesco v. Todesco, 583 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) the court stated:

Additionally, child support guidelines, while helpful, are not to be automatically applied; the court should consider both the needs of the child and the overall financial circumstances of the parties. Hillman v. Hillman, 567 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Huff v. Huff, 556 So.2d 537…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Todesco v. TodescoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Gutierrez v. GutierrezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Homestead v. SuarezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Perez v. PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API