Legal Opinion

Newell v. Newell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 2011No. 3-10-0003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

Justice O’Brien concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Schmidt dissented, with opinion.

OPINION

Jarred Newell filed a complaint against his mother, Ruth Newell, and First Midwest Bancorp Inc. (FMB), alleging conversion and breach of contract involving Ruth’s unauthorized withdrawal of funds from a savings account in his name. The trial court ruled that Jarred’s complaint was barred by the three-year statute of limitations in section 4 — 111 of the Uniform Commercial Code — Bank Deposits and Collections (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/4 — 111 (West 2006)) and granted FMB’s motion for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Leydig, Voit & MayerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heiman v. Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Crawford v. Belhaven Realty LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. Hassebrock v. CEJA CorporationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Fifth Third Bank v. BrazierAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Jackiewicz v. Village of BolingbrookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API