Legal Opinion
Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 2010No. 09-15030PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a credit reporting agency is liable for a disputed credit report under California’s Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act.
I
A
In October 2001, Noemia Carvalho received medical treatment from Bayside Medical Group, Inc. (“Bayside”), in Pleasanton, California. Prior to receiving her treatment, Carvalho signed the following agreement (“Agreement”):
Bayside Medical Group, Inc., will bill your insurance as a courtesy to you. If your insurance does not pay the claim within 90 days of the date of service, the balance of your account will be your…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010