Legal Opinion

Dan & Sherman v. Serrano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1991No. Nos. 89-2819, 89-2292 and 89-2267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

Maria Serrano, joined by her husband, Manuel, brought a malpractice action against Dr. Lewis Dan, M.D., his P.A., Dan & Sherman, M.D., P.A., and Dr. William Sabates and his P.A., which sounded in tort for negligently diagnosing and treating a brain tumor as glaucoma. On the eve of trial, the plaintiff settled with Dr. Sabates and his P.A. for $350,000. This was applied $99,999 to Maria and $250,001 to her husband. All of this was done without the acquiescence of the other defendants. After the settlement, Dr. Sabates and his P.A. were dismissed as defendants. At the opening of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Young v. AltenhausSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Florida Greyhound Lines v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. City of Tamarac v. GarcharDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Lotspeich Co. v. Neogard Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Ash v. StellaSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. State, DhrsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Higgs v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API