Legal Opinion

Riggenbach v. Rhodes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 2019No. Case No. 5D18-1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

We grant Respondent's motion for rehearing only to the extent that it correctly points out that Respondent challenged the constitutionality of the controlling 2013 amendments to Chapter 766 in his opposition to Petitioners' motion to dismiss and challenged it again in his motion for reconsideration. However, each time the trial court ruled on Petitioners' motion to dismiss, it declined to rule on the constitutional issues that Respondent had raised and argued below. In all other respects, Respondent's motion for rehearing is denied. Accordingly, we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Daniels v. Florida Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Williams v. OkenSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Kephart v. HadiSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. DumiganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackshear, Jr., M. D., P. A., Blackshear, M. D. v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  2. Daddono v. KnightDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  3. Ghamra, M. D., Lung Associates of Sarasota, LLC v. Williams, Estate of Derrick WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  4. Joseph Montonye v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  5. MARIA MARTINEZ v. DON JOHN PEREZ-ORTIZ, M. D. AND THE PEREZ EYE CENTER, P. L.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API