Legal Opinion

Hill v. Woodmen of World Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 15, 1965No. 18361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

This is an action on the double indemnity feature of a policy of insurance on the life of James Freddie Hill, who died suddenly while at work on February 3, 1961. The undertaking by the company was to pay in case death “occurred in consequence of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means, of which * * * there is a visible contusion or wound on the exterior of the body, * * * as a direct result thereof, independently of all other causes.”

A hearing was held to determine whether Hill’s death was compensable under the South Carolina…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Goethe v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Travelers Ins. Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  4. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heaton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
  2. Deese v. AMERICAN BANKERS LIFE ASSUR. OF FLA.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API