Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. State ex rel. Protection of C.L.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 2016No. 01-15-00371-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Harvey Brown, Justice

Daniel Shoemaker challenges a protective order entered in favor of Clarissa2 under Chapter 7A of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. He argues that (1) legally and factually insufficient evidence exists to support the order and (2) provisions of the statute allowing a trial court to issue a protective order in favor of a complainant who is a victim of the defendant’s stalking violate the constitutional right to due process. We affirm.

Background

In October 2014, Clarissa, through the Travis County Attorney’s Office, filed an application for a protective order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State for Protection of P. B. v. v. T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2019
  2. Allen Gerard Hollimon v. Valencia Lana Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2023
  3. David Seals v. Keturah Wilbourn, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018
  4. Derrick Wayne Gamble v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  5. James Richard Sharp II v. Chloe Ann Jimmerson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API