Shoemaker v. State ex rel. Protection of C.L.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Harvey Brown, Justice
Daniel Shoemaker challenges a protective order entered in favor of Clarissa2 under Chapter 7A of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. He argues that (1) legally and factually insufficient evidence exists to support the order and (2) provisions of the statute allowing a trial court to issue a protective order in favor of a complainant who is a victim of the defendant’s stalking violate the constitutional right to due process. We affirm.
Background
In October 2014, Clarissa, through the Travis County Attorney’s Office, filed an application for a protective order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State for Protection of P. B. v. v. T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2019
- Allen Gerard Hollimon v. Valencia Lana Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2023
- David Seals v. Keturah Wilbourn, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018
- Derrick Wayne Gamble v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
- James Richard Sharp II v. Chloe Ann Jimmerson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.