Martin, Cobb & Co. v. Curd's adm'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 82 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED— Sec. 34, chapter 37, Rev. Stat., 509. Willard’s Equity Jurisprudence, 123. Bouvier’s Law Die., “ Creditor.” 6 B. Mon., 606; Underwood vs. Ogden. 13 B. Mon., 555; Busby's adm'r vs. Chenault. Story on Agency, secs. 34, 111, 112, 374, 376, and 74, note. CITED— Sec. 34, chapter 37, Rev. Stat. Sec. 273, Civil Code. 1 Metcalfe, 450; Terrell vs. Jennings. CITED— Sec. 34, article 2, 1 Stant.
Read the full summary
CASE 82 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED— Sec. 34, chapter 37, Rev. Stat., 509. Willard’s Equity Jurisprudence, 123. Bouvier’s Law Die., “ Creditor.” 6 B. Mon., 606; Underwood vs. Ogden. 13 B. Mon., 555; Busby's adm'r vs. Chenault. Story on Agency, secs. 34, 111, 112, 374, 376, and 74, note. CITED— Sec. 34, chapter 37, Rev. Stat. Sec. 273, Civil Code. 1 Metcalfe, 450; Terrell vs. Jennings. CITED— Sec. 34, article 2, 1 Stant. Rev. Stat.,p. 509. U. S. Digest, vol. for 1857, p. 474. 5 Selden’s (N. Y.) Rep., 476; Gibson vs. Stanton. CITED— Sec. 9, 2 Slant. Rev.…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Peters
These three appeals are prosecuted on the same record. The two first named involve nearly the same questions. They were all heard together, and will now be decided in the order in which they here stand.
H. T. Curd, a resident of the city of Louisville, died there in February, 1859, intestate. He was then, and had been previous thereto, engaged in speculations of *329various kinds, requiring large sums of money, and in order to raise the requisite amounts, Curd in very many, if not in all cases, drew bills or drafts which he procured others to accept, and to meet these bills he consigned to the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cain's Adm'r v. Ky. & Indiana Bridge & R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907