Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 23, 1932No. 7981Published

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Defendant, United States (of America, I assume), demurs to the amended supplemental petition of plaintiff, for that (a) the amended petition states no cause of action against the defendant; (b) that this court has no jurisdiction to review the official acts of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in the matter of his either granting or denying a special assessment under the provisions of sections 327 and 328 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1093); and (e) because the claim for refund filed (as an exhibit to the petition) specifies, as the sole ground for sueh…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Hubbard v. SlavensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API