Legal Opinion
United States v. Feist
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided November 10, 2008No. 4:08-cr-00006Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ISSUE WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA
DANIEL L. HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Defendant’s pro se pleading entitled “Feist Petitions the Court to Issue a Writ of Audita Querela” filed on April 28, 2008. See Docket No. 2. The Government filed a response in opposition to the motion on June 27, 2008. See Docket No. 6. The Defendant filed a reply brief on July 14, 2008. See Docket No. 7. The Court denies the motion for the reasons set forth below.
I. BACKGROUND
The defendant, Sebastian Joseph Feist, was indicted on five counts for his part in the kidnapping…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Ralph R. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Gary William HoltCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.