Legal Opinion

Borgia v. Interboro General Hospital

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

While a disabling illness may excuse an attorney’s delay in serving a complaint, in this case the default occurred well after the illness and therefore the default was not excused. Accordingly, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. ScivolettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  2. Cynan Sheetmetal Products, Inc. v. B.R. Fries & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Anderson v. DotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Dimopoulos v. CaposellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Dayan v. DarcheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API