Ranta v. Rake
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentMcFADDEN, Chief Justice
whom SMITH, J., concurs).
In addition to the factual statement contained in the foregoing opinion certain other facts should be mentioned.
Appellant at the time of execution of the general release by himself and his wife had discussed with his doctor the nature of the injuries he suffered, including his back injuries. He had also discussed with his doctor the execution of the release in question. He stated: “I would have told him [his physician] that when we were healed, when we were released by him that he would sign the release.” His doctor testified that whenever there is a back injury, one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
- Bennett v. DeatonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Thomas v. HollowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.