Legal Opinion

Young v. Keele

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1987No. B019444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

The novel issue on this appeal is whether a judgment debtor at his judgment debtor’s examination can refuse to answer questions related to settlement negotiations that occurred after the judgment.

On November 7, 1984, a judgment was entered against Michael L. Keele and Michael L. Keele Enterprises, Inc. (collectively Keele) for $484,000. The judgment was in favor of Harry S. Young, Jai H. Young, Harold Singh, Benita I. Singh, Syed A. Ali and Anita A. Ali (judgment creditors). Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 708.110, subdivision (a) 1 judgment creditors set for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Coleman v. GalvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Covell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaushansky v. Stonecroft Attorneys, APCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API