Legal Opinion

Burson v. Simard

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 2012No. 35, Sept. Term, 2011PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In yet another foreclosure case, we address the consequences of a default by the successful bidder at an auction of real property. After the auction sale was ratified, Respondent David Simard defaulted on his contract to purchase the real property in question. Simard admitted liability for the risk and expense of the initial resale, but when the purchaser at the resale defaulted as well, Simard balked at paying the expense and loss incurred at a second resale. Applying Maryland Rule 14-305(g), the Circuit Court for Baltimore County held that Simard was liable for the risk and expense of both…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Norwilton Murray v. Fairbanks Morse, Beloit Power Systems, Inc., in No. 78-2224. Cross Appeal of Norwilton Murray, in No. 78-2225Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. United States of America, in 95-1987. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Consolidated Rail Corporation, in 95-1988Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Ocean Petroleum, Co. v. YanekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  2. CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Greentree Series V, Inc. v. HofmeisterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Satterfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Blumberg v. RoneyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API