Legal Opinion
Woodward v. Daugherty
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided February 28, 2012No. 5:11-cv-8-RJCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, (Doc. Nos. 47 & 72). In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir.1975), Plaintiff was advised of the necessity of filing responses to both motions and of the manner in which evidence could be submitted to the Court. See (Doc. Nos. 52; 79). On July 28, 2011, and on November 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed his Responses. (Doc. Nos. 57; 81).
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aluminium Bahrain B.S.C. v. DahdalehDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Knutson v. HamiltonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Riddick v. KiserDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023