Legal Opinion

Fischman v. Kiphart

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1957No. 29573PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Commissioner.

This is an action for rent brought against the tenant of an office that he had rented. The tenancy was month to month and the plaintiff seeks to recover one month’s rent in the sum of $50. The action was instituted in the Magistrate Court of the City of St. Louis, where the trial resulted in a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed to the circuit court and there, upon a trial to the court, the defendant again prevailed, and the plaintiff has again appealed.

The facts of the matter are that in February, 1954, the defendant rented, from the plaintiff, office space…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleary v. ClearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. HaasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Buck v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Corby v. Brill Book & Stationery Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co. v. AlexanderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Hanover Insurance Company v. AbchalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. National Alfalfa D. & M. Co. v. 4010 Washington, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Rauth v. DennisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Garrison v. J. L. Querner Truck Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API