Legal Opinion

Thomas A. Munz v. Tobin Michael, Deputy U.S. Marshal Kirk Papenthien, Deputy U.S. Marshal, David R. Hansen, U.S. District Judge

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1994No. 93-1865PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a Bivens action by Thomas A. Munz against United States Deputy Marshals Kirk Papenthien and Tobin Michael (defendants) for violation of his Eighth Amendment rights based on a claim of use of excessive force. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the merits and based on qualified immunity. The district court1 denied defendants’ summary judgment motion on the merits and on their defense of qualified immunity. Defendants appeal. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts in this case are hotly contested. Because this case comes to us from a denial of defendants’…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Boyd v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Banks v. County of AlleghenyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. McLaurin v. PraterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API