Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

First Virginia Banks, Incorporated v. Bp Exploration & Oil, Incorporated Standard Oil Company Bp America, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 14, 2000No. 99-1042Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilkins, Circuit Judge

The majority opinion affirms the grant of summary judgment by the district court on both FVBI’s trespass claim and its third-party beneficiary claim. I concur regarding the third-party beneficiary claim but respectfully dissent regarding the trespass cause of action. I would conclude that the trespass claim is not barred to the extent FVBI seeks damages for migrations of contaminants that occurred during the five years immediately prior to the filing of this action.

I

In granting summary judgment against FVBI, the district court stated that FVBI’s entire trespass cause of action accrued when…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vines v. BranchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  2. Hampton Roads Sanitation District v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Virginia Hot Springs Co. v. McCraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  4. Cooper v. HornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API