Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1996No. 96-207Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the portion of the revocation order finding that the defendant violated his probation. However, as the State properly concedes, the trial court failed to give the defendant full credit for time served under the first part of his split sentence. See Jones v. State, 570 So.2d 345 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Coney v. State, 519 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the order calculating the defendant’s credit for time served and remand to the trial court for a determination of the proper credit for time served.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part; and remanded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Coney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API