Legal Opinion

Jane PP. v. Paul QQ.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1984PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

A filiation order which makes no provision for support constitutes an order appealable as of right under section 1112 of the Family Court Act, when the paternity proceeding has not sought support, but is not appealable without permission when support was sought in the paternity petition. There should, therefore, be a reversal and remittal to the Appellate Division.

In separate petitions to establish paternity and for support, petitioner sought relief against respondent. The paternity petition asked for a declaration of paternity, an order of support and other and further…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Susan W. v. Amhad Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Karen K. v. Christopher D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Etheridge v. CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Kordek v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by66 opinions

  1. Department of Social Services ex rel. Katherine McL. v. Jay W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Elacqua v. James EE.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Menaldino v. Mark UU.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Harstein v. Mike S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Niagara County Department of Social Services ex rel. Kimmie W. v. Randy M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API