Legal Opinion

Beck v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2005No. 04-3967Unpublished

1Per curiam

Minnesota inmate Beck appeals the district court’s * pre-service dismissal of Beck’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, under to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and the denial of his Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. Having reviewed the record de novo, we conclude dismissal was proper. See Beck v. LaFleur, 257 F.3d 764, 766 (8th Cir.2001) (prisoner must allege defendant’s personal involvement or responsibility for constitutional violations to state § 1983 claim); Frey v. City of Herculaneum, 44 F.3d 667, 672 (8th Cir.1995) (civil rights plaintiff cannot pursue section 1983 claim against officials under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frey v. City Of HerculaneumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Beck v. LaFleurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API