Legal Opinion
Satterfield v. Boles
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1969No. 11689PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Denial of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge, 297 F.Supp. 609.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Satterfield v. BolesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969