Legal Opinion
Washington v. Holmes Barnes
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1941No. 2275PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff and appellant urges three principal errors in his application for a rehearing which will be discussed briefly in the order in which they are presented:
First, that the penalty provided by the statute where a lump sum settlement is set aside should have been allowed. Whether or not this penalty should be allowed is of no importance in this case if our method of calculating partial permanent disability as adopted in the opinion is correct. We found that the extent of this disability was 20%, and if the penalty was allowed even on the claimed weekly wage of $13.25, the compensation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Quave v. Lott-Batson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Delaney v. Ferd. Brenner Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Thompson v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Nichols v. Tall Timber Lumber Co. of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vilce v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Barentine v. W. R. Aldrich Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
- Moore v. AysenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Williams v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
- Richardson v. American Employers' Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.