Pagarigan v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, J.
Summary
This writ petition presents the question whether a Medicare health care service plan may enforce a plan arbitration provision although that provision does not comply with statutory disclosure requirements applicable to all health care service plan arbitration agreements under California law. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandate vacating the trial court’s order granting the Medicare plan’s petition to compel arbitration. Because we agree with the petitioner that neither the Federal Arbitration Act nor federal Medicare provisions preempt California’s mandatory…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alfred Minasyan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- ZEMBSCH v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Imbler v. Pacificare of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Martin v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.