Legal Opinion

Thomas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1993No. Nos. 91-CF-113, 91-CF-818Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en bane in no. 91-CF-113, 619 A.2d 20, appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc in no. 91-CF-818, 619 A.2d 30, and the joint response of appellants thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division * in no. 91-CF-113 that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court in both appeals has voted to grant the petitions for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are granted and that the opinions and judgments of December 30, 1992, are…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API