Legal Opinion

Moss v. Ingram

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1922No. 1291. [fn*]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

, HIGGINS, J.

On February 14, 1920, Mrs. Moss, the plaintiff in error, brought this suit to recover a 46V10-acre tract of land in Stephens county against S. W. Ingram, 0. P. Ingram, Elbert Hill, the Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corporation of America, the Pennock Oil Company, the Prairie Oil & Gas Company, and W. P. Moss.

The land in controversy is the same involved in the suit of W. P. Moss v. Seth j Ingram (Tex. Civ. App.) reported in 224 S. : W. 258, wherein the defendant in the pres- ! ent suit, W. P. Moss, sought to recover said j land of the present defendant, S. W. Ingram. I W. P. Moss…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wright v. Hays' Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Johnson v. BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Daniel v. MasonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Fullerton v. DoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Harris v. HamiltonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ross, by Next Friend v. Tidewater Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Webb v. WebbTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Newman v. BordenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Service Parts Co. v. BizzellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Tide Water Oil Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API