Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Unified School District No. 490 v. Celotex Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 29, 1981No. 51,030Published

1Concurrence

Rees, J.:

Concurring. I concur in the affirmance of the judgments in favor of U.S.D. 490 and in the reversal of the judgments in favor of Sunflower. However, I have some concern as to possible future reliance upon what is said in the majority opinion.

The essence of the school district’s case against Celotex is a products liability claim. As has become all too typical in products liability cases, this case was tried, submitted to the jury and briefed on appeal as one brought on a homogenized theory of recovery; its ingredients are breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Temmen v. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Frame, Administrator v. BaumanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Hess v. JarboeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Culp v. BlossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API