Unified School District No. 490 v. Celotex Corp.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Concurrence
Rees, J.:
Concurring. I concur in the affirmance of the judgments in favor of U.S.D. 490 and in the reversal of the judgments in favor of Sunflower. However, I have some concern as to possible future reliance upon what is said in the majority opinion.
The essence of the school district’s case against Celotex is a products liability claim. As has become all too typical in products liability cases, this case was tried, submitted to the jury and briefed on appeal as one brought on a homogenized theory of recovery; its ingredients are breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Temmen v. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Frame, Administrator v. BaumanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Hess v. JarboeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Culp v. BlossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.