Legal Opinion

Charlton v. Southern Pacific R. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1893No. 14,921Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; William P. Wade, Judge. Action by G. G. Charlton against the Southern Pacific Railroad Company to quiet title. There was a judgment in favor of defendant and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

The plaintiff commenced this action on September 30, 1890, to quiet his title as against the defendant to a tract of land in Los Angeles county, described as “fractional section 7, in township 2 north, range 16 west, San Bernardino base and meridian,’’ The complaint alleged “that the plaintiff is now, and for a long time hitherto has been, in the possession of and is the owner (subject only to the paramount title of the United States) of that certain real property situate,” etc. The answer denied the plaintiff’s possession or ownership of the land described, subject only to the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jatunn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Forrester v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API