Legal Opinion
Paul v. Premier Electrical Construction Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1983No. 83 Civ. 4928(MEL)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff opposes this motion but asks, in the event that it is granted,' that the suit be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). At oral argument heard on November 18, 1983, defendants represented that they did not oppose a transfer of the suit to Illinois. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is denied but the case is transferred to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bensusan Restaurant Corporation v. Richard B. King, Individually and Doing Business as the Blue NoteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Pilates, Inc. v. Pilates Institute, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Kinetic Instruments, Inc. v. LaresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Carlson v. CuevasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.