Legal Opinion

Harjo v. Mathis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1935No. 24075PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This was an action in c-jectment, for the recovery of an undivided one-fourth interest in a tract of land in Seminole county, which plaintiffs claimed to own by inheritance. The case was tried to the court, a jury being waived. No request for special findings was made by either party. The court made a general finding of all the issues in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs, which finding is fully supported by the evidence.

The only question presented here is as to whether or not the action was barred by the 15-year statute of limitations. Section 183, C. O. S. 1921, section 99,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shirey v. WhitlowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Joyce v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Hudson v. StillwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Honeyman v. AndrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Miller v. Vizzard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. HarjoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Shanks v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Harjo's Heirs v. StandleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Melton v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Harjo's Heirs v. StandleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API