Legal Opinion

Troup v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1951No. 33636, 33637, 33638PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

1. The only question raised and urged by counsel for the defendant in their brief on the general grounds is whether these transactions were cash transactions or credit *143transactions; therefore it is unnecessary to lengthen the opinion by pointing out in detail the evidence in the record showing the sale of the livestock specified in the bill of indictment, that the livestock was disposed of by the defendant without having paid for same, that the Farmers’ Livestock Auction Company Inc. sustained a loss by reason of these acts of the defendant, that the defendant was a person engaged in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Loeb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Pope & FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Sutton v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Gray v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Tuggle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Troup v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Troup v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API