Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carlini v. Highmark

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 2000Published

1ConcurrencePellegrini, Judge

While I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) granting the preliminary injunction filed by Charles'J. Carlini, M.D. (Dr. Carli-*1189ni) because it was the Medical Review Committee’s ultimate decision to reinstate his participation in the Keystone network, I disagree with the majority that High-mark was a “state actor” requiring Dr. Carlini to be provided with due process during the recredentialing process.

In 1997, Dr. Carlini was informed by Highmark’s medical director that its Credentials Committee had denied his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. CroninSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. McGowan v. University of ScrantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Rudolph v. Pennsylvania Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API