Legal Opinion

United States v. Lahey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 8, 2013No. Case No. 10-CR-765 (KMK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

On August 2, 2011, the Government charged Ezra Arthur Davis III (“Davis”) and Walter Tarrats (“Tarrats”) (collectively, “the Moving Defendants”), along with three others, in an eleven-count Superceding Indictment. (Indictment (“SI”) (Dkt. No. 53).) In the Superceding Indictment, the Government alleges that each of the five Defendants was a member of either the Pagans’ or Mongols’ Outlaw Motorcy*736ele Club, and that they, among other things, engaged in a narcotics conspiracy. (Id.) Here, the Court considers the Moving Defendants’ Motions To…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fyock v. City of SunnyvaleDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Doe v. Putnam Cnty.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. CuomoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Avitabile v. BeachDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API