Legal Opinion

Meadowland Apartments v. Schumacher

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2012No. 26133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Heidi Schumacher signed a renewed lease with Meadowland Apartments (Meadowland). Meadowland later filed an eviction action against Schumacher, alleging that she was in material non-compliance with the lease. Schumacher moved for a continuance of the court trial, which the magistrate court denied. At the conclusion of the court trial, the magistrate court found that Schumacher was a disabled person under the Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), but that Meadowland had made reasonable accommodations for her disability. The magistrate court also found that Schumacher’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. City of Treasure IslandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. ShawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re C.J.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eagle Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Kaberna v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Vor, Inc. v. Estate of O'farrellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Anderson v. StreeterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Interest of A.L. and D.L.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API