Legal Opinion

People v. McDaniel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2003No. Docket 122922PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Per curiam

This case requires us to determine whether a police laboratory report is admissible, notwithstanding that it is hearsay, to prove the identity of a seized substance. The Court of Appeals held that the report was admissible under the public records exception to the hearsay rule, MRE 803(8), and affirmed defendant’s conviction on one count of delivery of less than fifty grams of heroin, MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(iv). We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, vacate defendant’s conviction, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

I

Defendant was charged with selling a packet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. MassMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Solomon v. ShuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. StacyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. FeezelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. MardlinMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. SealsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API