Legal Opinion

Sawma v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment vacated on the law, determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Although petitioner sought mandamus and claimed that respondent’s determination was arbitrary and capricious, the only issue in this CPLR article 78 proceeding is whether respondent’s determination made after a fair hearing is supported by substantial evidence in the record (CPLR 7803 [4]). Special Term should have transferred the matter to this court (CPLR 7804 [g]), and we treat the matter as if it had been properly transferred (Matter of Curl v Kelly, 125 AD2d 948). Pursuant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curl v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin J. Sawma v. Cesar A. Perales, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. McCrimmon v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Martin J. Sawma v. Cesar A. Perales, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API