Legal Opinion

People v. Purtell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

While a defendant must be sentenced "without unreasonable delay” (CPL 380.30 [1]), delay caused by a defendant’s conduct is excusable (People v Drake, 61 NY2d 359, 366). Defendant first absconded in 1989, after pleading guilty to grand larceny. Thereafter, he was arrested and convicted of various crimes in several different States, and he repeatedly jumped bail that was set on New York fugitive warrants, after using aliases and false pedigrees. Although the 41/2 year period of delay in imposing sentence is considerable, it was entirely attributable to defendant’s conduct, and accordingly, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API