Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Munitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 7, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendants, husband and wife, are judicially separated. The dental services were rendered by plaintiff to the wife and child of defendants, subsequent to the entry of an order for temporary alimony and support. Moreover, it is conceded the wife agreed to'-personally pay plaintiff and that he knew of defendants’' separation. It is also conceded that the husband made no agreement to pay or be liable for the services rendered by plaintiff.

In the circumstances, the husband’s obligations were fixed by the support order of the court and, in the absence of a specific agreement by him to pay for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gallin v. StaffordCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959
  2. Olsen v. OlsenNew York Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amplo v. Di MauroSuffolk County District Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API