Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Stephens

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1941No. 2152PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Cecil Stephens instituted this suit against Joe Pittman to recover damages resulting from an alleged unlawful assault by Pittman in which Pittman shot Stephens in the chest with a pistol. The defendant, Pittman, answered, among other things, that Stephens made an attack upon him and threatened to kill him and that in shooting plaintiff he acted in self-defense. In an*315■swer to issues submitted, the jury found that defendant committed an assault upon plaintiff; that plaintiff sustained injuries; that as a result of the assault plaintiff’s damages for medicine and doctor’s bills…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. March v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. EctorTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Landa v. ObertTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BenavidezTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Simpson v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. City of Dallas v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Fuller v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Hair v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API