Legal Opinion

Mason v. St. Louis Union Stock Yards Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

The petition in this ease is to wit: “Plaintiffs state that they are now, and were at all of the times hereinafter stated, copartners in business under the name and style of Mason, Young and Company, and engaged in the business of buying and selling live stock and of forwarding the same to St. Louis Union Stock Yards Company; that the said St. Louis Stock Yards Company was at all of the times hereinafter stated, and is now; a business corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, and engaged in the business in the city of St. Louis of receiving, feeding, stabling, yarding and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. McDermott v. ClaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Wiser v. ChesleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Davis v. GayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Lynch v. St. Joseph & Iowa RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lackawanna Chapter of Railway & Locomotive Historical Society, Inc. v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Rayl v. KreilichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Lackawanna Chapter v. St. Louis Cty.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API