Legal Opinion
Maricle v. Hinds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 25, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 24, 2008, which ruled that claimant had exacerbated a prior compensable injury and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.
Claimant, a tool and model maker, sustained a work-related back injury in 2001, for which he intermittently missed time from work and received workers’ compensation benefits. In 2007, claimant again missed work and required medical treatment due to back pain, and the self-insured employer and its third-party administrator (hereinafter collectively referred to as the employer) alleged that the pain was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Imbriani v. Berkar Knitting MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claims of Baer v. Eden Park Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Webb v. Cooper Crouse Hinds Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Lomuscio v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Britton v. Ruberoid Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Pena v. Alize II Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Cush v. Tully Constr. Co. Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Bufearon v. City of Rochester Bur. of Empl. RelationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018