Legal Opinion
Beckett v. Kent County
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 10, 1980No. G 79-455 CA 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BENJAMIN F, GIBSON, District Judge.
Ms. Lee Euster Beckett, plaintiff, has requested that this Court exercise its discretion pursuant to Section 706(f)(1) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (1976), as amended, to appoint an attorney to represent her with respect to her employment discrimination claim against the defendant, Kent County, Michigan. Ms. Beckett claims that Kent County failed to hire her on account of her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1976), as amended [hereinafter “Title VII”].
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fulton CASTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, HATTIESBURG, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- George L. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALGREEN’S DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Petete v. Consolidated FreightwaysDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1970
- Green v. Cotton Concentration CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Edmonds v. EI duPONT deNEMOURS & COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Zoological Society of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Zoological Society of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981