Rosenthal v. Light
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Thomas Light, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of April, 1918, overruling a demurrer to the amended complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
The plaintiffs allege that they are the sole members of two copartnerships, one conducting business under the firm name and style of I. & H. Rosenthal, and the other under the firm name and style of Samuel Rosenthal’s “ Rochester Special,” and that both were and are engaged in business as wholesale manufacturers of and dealers in men’s and youths’ clothing; that on the 1st day of October, 1915, the two copartnerships entered into an agreement in writing with the defendant whereby he agreed to procure to be incorporated under the laws of Connecticut, on or before the 9th day of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flaherty v. CaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Fennessy v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Flaherty v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Day v. Hecla Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923