Legal Opinion

Paredes v. Cochran

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 1996No. 95-1105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse an order denying a motion to vacate a default judgment in this forfeiture action, because appellant was not properly served. We agree with the conclusion of the third district, in Hicks v. City of Hialeah, 647 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), that service of process of the complaint and rule to show cause in forfeiture actions is governed by the same rules as service of process in other civil actions. Service by certified mail on appellant’s parole officer in New York was thus insufficient.

The sheriff argues that appellant does not have standing because he has no interest in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. City of HialeahDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ocean Bank v. Save Import & Export, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Rubin Young, et al. v. Hon. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API