Legal Opinion

Dixie Margarine Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 8, 1938No. Docket No. 79372Published

From 1923 to 1931 petitioner manufactured and sold a product composed of mixtures of vegetable oils, salt, and skimmed milk, which the Bureau of Internal Revenue held was subject to tax as oleomargarine. During such period petitioner paid the required stamp tax on its product, and deducted the amounts in its income tax returns as part of the cost of goods sold.

Read the full summary

From 1923 to 1931 petitioner manufactured and sold a product composed of mixtures of vegetable oils, salt, and skimmed milk, which the Bureau of Internal Revenue held was subject to tax as oleomargarine. During such period petitioner paid the required stamp tax on its product, and deducted the amounts in its income tax returns as part of the cost of goods sold. In 1932 the Supreme Court held that a product similar to that of petitioner did not come within the taxing statutes, and in the same year the Commissioner refunded to petitioner all amounts theretofore paid by it as stamp taxes except…

1Opinion of the Court

DIXIE MARGARINE COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Dixie Margarine Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 79372.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

38 B.T.A. 471; 1938 BTA LEXIS 861;

September 8, 1938, Promulgated

From 1923 to 1931 petitioner manufactured and sold a product composed of mixtures of vegetable oils, salt, and skimmed milk, which the Bureau of Internal Revenue held was subject to tax as oleomargarine. During such period petitioner paid the required stamp tax on its product, and deducted the amounts in its income tax returns as part of the cost of goods sold.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dixie Margarine Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API