Legal Opinion

Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. Knox

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1926No. 25394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The appellants filed a bill in the chancery court of Pearl River county, seeking to perpetually enjoin Rush IT. Knox, attorney-general, and E. C. Sharp, F. C. Ha-thorn, and E'. B. Williams, attorneys at law employed by Rush H. Knox, from the prosecution of an appeal taken by the attorney-general from the assessment of the lands and timber of the appellants, as made by Pearl River county for the years 1923' and 1924. A temporary in june tion was issued and served, and thereupon the appellees, through their attorneys Rawls and Hathorn, filed a plea, demurrer, and answer to the hill of complaint…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex parte WimberlyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  2. State Ex Rel. Knox. v. Wyoming Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bass v. NelmsMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Thompson v. KrutzerMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Robertson v. Montgomery Baseball Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Thatcher v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. McArdle's Estate v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City of Hattiesburg v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API