Henry & John Associates v. Demilo Construction Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert A. Posner, J.
This petition to discharge a mechanic’s lien raises an interesting question of law: Must the lien be discharged because sloppy, ambiguous language is used in the notice of lien to describe the work performed?
*355Under section 3 of the Lien Law, a lien attaches for labor "for the improvement of real property” and this is defined in section 2 (4), as including, "the demolition, erection, alteration or repair of any structure”. The notice of lien in this case recited that: "The labor performed was the management and supervision of obtaining new building…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Goldberger-Raabin, Inc. v. 74 Second Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Pascual v. Greenleaf Park Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Carl A. Morse, Inc. v. Rentar Industrial Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1976
- Meo v. Skellyway Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chas. H. Sells, Inc. v. Chance Hills Joint VentureNew York Supreme Court · 1995