Legal Opinion

Henry & John Associates v. Demilo Construction Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert A. Posner, J.

This petition to discharge a mechanic’s lien raises an interesting question of law: Must the lien be discharged because sloppy, ambiguous language is used in the notice of lien to describe the work performed?

*355Under section 3 of the Lien Law, a lien attaches for labor "for the improvement of real property” and this is defined in section 2 (4), as including, "the demolition, erection, alteration or repair of any structure”. The notice of lien in this case recited that: "The labor performed was the management and supervision of obtaining new building…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Goldberger-Raabin, Inc. v. 74 Second Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Pascual v. Greenleaf Park Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Carl A. Morse, Inc. v. Rentar Industrial Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Meo v. Skellyway Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chas. H. Sells, Inc. v. Chance Hills Joint VentureNew York Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API